In what aspect does the RBRVS system differ from traditional fee-for-service models?

The RBRVS (Resource-Based Relative Value Scale) system significantly differs from traditional fee-for-service models primarily because it incorporates geographical adjustments. This means that the reimbursement rates are adjusted based on the cost of living and practice expenses in different regions. Such adjustments recognize that the cost of delivering healthcare services can vary significantly across different geographic locations, ensuring that providers are compensated fairly based on their specific circumstances.

In contrast, traditional fee-for-service models generally do not account for geographical variations, which can lead to disparities in payment regardless of the actual costs incurred by providers in different areas. This geographical adjustment mechanism in RBRVS helps promote equity in payment structures for healthcare providers and can influence providers' decisions about where to practice based on economic viability.

The other options presented do not capture the essence of how RBRVS diverges from traditional fee-for-service models. The reliance on patient feedback, limitations on patient choice, and focus on capitation payments are not defining characteristics of the RBRVS system as understood in the context of its comprehensive and adjusted approach to valuing medical services.